Nine Fast Facts about Paternity Fraud in Missouri

Here are 9 fast facts about the impact of Paternity Fraud / Child Support Fraud in Missouri:

  1. Most states require nonbiological fathers to keep paying child support even if they were deceived by their spouses.. Including Missouri.
  2. American Association of Blood Bank survey of 30,626 paternity tests shows that 30 percent of men taking tests were not the fathers.
  3. A minimum of 90,000 men are yearly being made to pay for a child that is not theirs the United States and 1782 of these are Missouri Men.
  4. Paternity Fraud deprives the child the right to his natural father’s family medical history and support.
  5. Contact your Missouri Senators at http://www.senate.mo.gov/webmail/mail_form.aspx and tell them you support SB141 - Paternity Reform.
  6. Over 60,000 families in Missouri are affected by Paternity Fraud in Missouri  http://www.maketherealdadpay.org
  7. Over 30000 men in Missouri are victims of Child Support Abuse  - Find out about Senate Bill SB141 at http://www.maketherealdadpay.org
  8. Over 35000 children are victims of Child Support Abuse in Missouri - http://maketherealdadpay.org
    By the year 2029, over 58900 men & 120,000 child paternity fraud victims will reside in Missouri.
  9. When a father is certain about paternity the non-paternity rate is low (1.7%) but when the father questions paternity the rate is high (29.8%).

Share This Post
 
 

Missouri Senate Makes Progress on SB141 - Paternity Fraud Legislation

This week Missouri Senate Bill 141 (SB141) progressed further in the Missouri Senate.  The Fiscal Notes and an initial Hearing in front of the General Laws Committee occured.

We’ll post more information as it’s received.  Of particular note is that the Fiscal Notes (which indicates potential costs to proposed bills) is IDENTICAL to the Fiscal Note from last years House Bill.  To summarize the Fiscal Note:

The Attorney Generals Office expects no financial costs

The State Courts Administrators Office expects no financial costs

The Department of Health and Senior Services expects no financial costs

The Department of Social Services - Family Support Division anticipates costs IDENTICAL to last years projections.  Of particular interest is when you drill down through the assumptions the costs that they do estimate seem to be either temporary or taken against future revenues.  That is to say that DSS-FSD anticipates no increases in staff or facilities to be required and that the direct losses of revenues they expect would be recovered in the future when they Make the Real Dad Pay.  Although, they don’t state it exactly that way in the Fiscal Note.

Share This Post
 
 

The Kansas City Star Covers Kansas, but not Missouri Paternity Reform

The Kansas City Star covered the effort in the Kansas Legislature to rid their state of paternity fraud.  But searching their website fails to see where they’re covering the effort in Missouri.

Fortunantly, one of our members posted comments on the stories!  Thank You!

The stories are:

‘Presumed father’ issue

Kansas bill aims to fix ‘presumed father’ quandary

Share This Post
 
 

Committee Hearing Scheduled for Missouri Paternity Reform Law

The Missouri Senate now has SB141 (The 2009 Missouri Paternity Reform Bill) scheduled for a committe hearing on Feb 2, 2009.  This is great news in that previous efforts have failed to get even this far (one previous effort was scheduled, then pulled from the schedule in 2008).

The Missouri Senate General Laws Committee meets on Feb 3, 2009 to discuss the proposed remofrm of Missouri Paternity Laws.

The Members of the Committee (with links to their websites so you can encourage them to act in favor of this bill) are:

The current bill summary state:

SB 141 - This act provides that a petitioner may at any time file a petition to challenge entry of a judgment of paternity and child support upon filing an affidavit stating that evidence exists which was not considered before entry of judgment. Such petition shall also include either an allegation that genetic testing was conducted within the past 90 days using DNA methodology, was performed by an expert, and that the test results indicate a 99% or greater probability that the petitioner is not the child’s father or a request to the court for an order of genetic paternity testing using DNA methodology. The court, after a hearing where all interested parties have been given an opportunity to present evidence and be heard and upon a finding of probable cause to believe the testing may result in a determination of non-paternity, may order the relevant parties to submit to genetic paternity testing. The petitioner shall pay for the costs of testing.

The court shall grant relief and enter judgment setting aside the previous judgment of paternity and child support, including a previous acknowledgment of paternity, extinguish any existing child support arrearage, and order the Department of Health and Senior Services to modify the child’s birth certificate accordingly upon a finding that the genetic test was properly conducted, accurate, and indicates a 99% or greater probability that the petitioner is not the child’s father. The provisions of this act shall not apply to grant relief to the parent of any adopted child.”

Share This Post
 
 

Mo Senator Jeff Smith submits SB141 in Missouri

Third Try at Bat for Paternity Fraud Victims in Missouri

On December 22, 2008 Missouri State Senator Jeff Smith (D 4th District) introduced SB141 for the 2009 Legislative Session of the Missouri Senate.

SB141 is essentially the same as HB 2322 (2008) and the MakeTheRealDadPay.org model legislation for Missouri.  The official summary (from the Missouri State Senate Website) states:

“SB 141 - This act provides that a petitioner may at any time file a petition to challenge entry of a judgment of paternity and child support upon filing an affidavit stating that evidence exists which was not considered before entry of judgment. Such petition shall also include either an allegation that genetic testing was conducted within the past 90 days using DNA methodology, was performed by an expert, and that the test results indicate a 99% or greater probability that the petitioner is not the child’s father or a request to the court for an order of genetic paternity testing using DNA methodology.

The court, after a hearing where all interested parties have been given an opportunity to present evidence and be heard and upon a finding of probable cause to believe the testing may result in a determination of non-paternity, may order the relevant parties to submit to genetic paternity testing. The petitioner shall pay for the costs of testing.

The court shall grant relief and enter judgment setting aside the previous judgment of paternity and child support, including a previous acknowledgment of paternity, extinguish any existing child support arrearage, and order the Department of Health and Senior Services to modify the child’s birth certificate accordingly upon a finding that the genetic test was properly conducted, accurate, and indicates a 99% or greater probability that the petitioner is not the child’s father. The provisions of this act shall not apply to grant relief to the parent of any adopted child.”

This isn’t perfect legislation..  But it’s very good and passable legislation that will free the victims of Paternity Fraud in Missouri.  MakeTheRealDadPay.org is wholeheartedly in favor of SB141 and you should be too.

Share This Post
 
 

Missouri Child Support Fraud Continues

Child Support Fraud in Missouri continues… Here is a story that describes the type of fraud we’re talking about. Two years and still nothing from the Missouri Legislature.

It’s time to educate yourself, and write/call/fax your Missouri State Senators and Representatives (lists in Links to the right) and make them Make the Real Dad Pay!

Share This Post
 
 

Missouri is no Better than Michigan

Missouri is no Better than Michigan when it comes to child support fraud.



Share This Post
 
 

Children are the Victims of Paternity Fraud

There is no doubt that paternity fraud is harming our families and children. Consider this…A Woman’s Day poll shows that 50%+ of the respondents would willingly lie about paternity in order to secure child support. Women who named potential fathers either lied or had no idea when after DNA Testing over 30% of these men were found to not be the father of the child. But the State has decided that they want the victims of paternity fraud to have no recourse. That if you, your husband, your son, your father is named as “the dad” then they will pay… forever. And the damage this does to marriages, families, the health of the victim and his family and on the misnamed children as well is both very real and totally unnecessary.

And it looks like your all alone with nowhere to go. Pleading to Legislatures to put truth and justice into the system falls on deaf ears. States collect Federal funds based on their child support enforcement collections. As long as they can name anyone and make them pay the State Government gets the benefit of Federal money. There arn’t support groups, financial assistance, counseling, or any other help available to the families who are paying for children they had no part in bringing in to this world. “But what about these children?” is a common rebuke we hear. Well, what about them? The lack of a true family medical history is endangering these children because their mother has decided to lie about who their father really is. They are emotionally damaged due to the lie their mother constructed for them to live. This cannot be fixed by simply stealing money for them. Only the real truth, honestly faced can.

This fraud only benefits a mother who doesn’t know which man is the real dad, and/or chooses to lie about it. This is not in the best interest of our children. Many States consider their forcing non-biological “fathers” to pay is part of mandating parental relationships with the children. Most of the cases we’ve seen the mothers are preventing contact, have moved away, or they have never had contact with the children. In some cases this may be the man’s choice. However there are hundreds of thousands of cases where all these mothers really want is the money. They do not believe that having a father in their child’s life is important and even if they do they are ignoring the real father of the child. Once the children know that the man they have known as “dad” is not their father this does damage to these kids that will never heal. Where they really come from and who is the real dad are questions that stress them out even further. All because their mother either doesn’t know who fathered her children or has chosen to lie about it.

Then, looking at the biological children of the falsley accused man….They have to bear the result of their real father beset with financial burdons, physical and mental stress, and likely depression. These children will suffer emotionally, physically, and financially their entire lives. Many times these children are in an environment filled with stress, hardship, and marital difficulty caused solely by paternity fraud. These hardships should not have to be endured by them. They see that by lying and committing fraud they can benefit. What kind of message are we sending to these kids? Allowing paternity fraud is definitely not in their best interest.

We need to end this injustice to our children. We need to make a positive example in Missouri and show every other State that paternity fraud will not be tolerated here. The time to end paternity fraud in Missouri is now. Our children cannot afford less.

Share This Post
 
 

Without Reform of Paternity Laws Fraud will Continue

Paula Zahn did a great piece on CNN about Paternity Fraud, and how unfair paternity laws destroy families.



Share This Post
 
 

Judge Judy weighs in on Unfair Paternity Laws

Judge Judy weighed in on unfair paterntiy laws on Larry King…

“If you have somebody who finds out two years, or three years, or five years, or 10 years after the event that he’s not a child’s biological father, and who wants to be relieved of that obligation, is it right to say to him, sorry, you may have been defrauded but the child’s best interests require you maintaining that parental relationship with the child and, therefore, we are not going to order a DNA test? And even if we do, we are not going to say you’re not the father. You’re going to pay support forever. Unreasonable.”

It’s obvious when someone is as outspoken as Judge Judy on the way Missouri defrauds non-dads.

Larry King show transcript here — http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0702/17/lkl.01.html

Share This Post
 
 
 
 

» recent comments

  • candle: Very nice! Thank you so ...
  • B-shui: Keep working ,great job!...
  • padova: Great thank You ! Good ...

» archives

» meta